<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 440 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261479</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to permit the advertisement expenses of Rs. 8,07,123 as a business deduction for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The tribunal held that the expenses were recurring and aimed at sales promotion, lacking enduring benefit and not constituting capital expenditure. The disallowance was deemed unjustified, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 440 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261479</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to permit the advertisement expenses of Rs. 8,07,123 as a business deduction for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The tribunal held that the expenses were recurring and aimed at sales promotion, lacking enduring benefit and not constituting capital expenditure. The disallowance was deemed unjustified, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>