<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261477</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order on reducing the addition for Arms Length Price in an international transaction was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s consideration of correct financial data for benchmarking and acceptance of pro rata data. The assessee&#039;s cross-objection succeeded in part, with the Tribunal allowing fresh comparables, exclusion of a comparable company based on precedent, and exclusion of bad debts from operational costs. The Tribunal remanded one issue for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer. Ultimately, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261477</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order on reducing the addition for Arms Length Price in an international transaction was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s consideration of correct financial data for benchmarking and acceptance of pro rata data. The assessee&#039;s cross-objection succeeded in part, with the Tribunal allowing fresh comparables, exclusion of a comparable company based on precedent, and exclusion of bad debts from operational costs. The Tribunal remanded one issue for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer. Ultimately, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>