<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on both issues. Regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on professional fees, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation that if payments were made before the end of the year, section 40(a)(ia) would not apply. On the disallowance of land levelling expenses due to lack of evidence, the Tribunal supported the Commissioner&#039;s decision to partially allow the expenses based on the assessee&#039;s explanation, reducing the disallowance to 50% of the total expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both instances, emphasizing the importance of timely payments and proper documentation to avoid disallowances under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on both issues. Regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on professional fees, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation that if payments were made before the end of the year, section 40(a)(ia) would not apply. On the disallowance of land levelling expenses due to lack of evidence, the Tribunal supported the Commissioner&#039;s decision to partially allow the expenses based on the assessee&#039;s explanation, reducing the disallowance to 50% of the total expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both instances, emphasizing the importance of timely payments and proper documentation to avoid disallowances under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>