<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 535 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171216</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the assessment of unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report was deemed insufficient, as the officer failed to provide substantial evidence to support the addition to the assessee&#039;s income. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal found the approved valuer&#039;s report submitted by the assessee to be valid, based on land rates fixed by the L&amp;amp;DO. The High Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 535 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171216</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the assessment of unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report was deemed insufficient, as the officer failed to provide substantial evidence to support the addition to the assessee&#039;s income. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal found the approved valuer&#039;s report submitted by the assessee to be valid, based on land rates fixed by the L&amp;amp;DO. The High Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>