<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1063 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171190</link>
    <description>The National Commission for Scheduled Castes can examine only complaints that fall within Article 338 and its procedure rules, namely matters genuinely alleging deprivation of Scheduled Caste safeguards, reservation-related violations, or caste-based harassment. Purely administrative or disciplinary grievances, disputes already sub judice or finally decided, and complaints lacking that nexus lie outside its cognizance. The Commission must also apply its summons power with restraint: personal attendance is justified only where demonstrably necessary for the inquiry. Where the university had already filed detailed replies and records, and the Vice-Chancellor was not a material witness, repeated summons and warrants were held mechanical and unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:28:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1063 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171190</link>
      <description>The National Commission for Scheduled Castes can examine only complaints that fall within Article 338 and its procedure rules, namely matters genuinely alleging deprivation of Scheduled Caste safeguards, reservation-related violations, or caste-based harassment. Purely administrative or disciplinary grievances, disputes already sub judice or finally decided, and complaints lacking that nexus lie outside its cognizance. The Commission must also apply its summons power with restraint: personal attendance is justified only where demonstrably necessary for the inquiry. Where the university had already filed detailed replies and records, and the Vice-Chancellor was not a material witness, repeated summons and warrants were held mechanical and unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>