<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 836 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171206</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise lacked jurisdiction to issue show cause notices for the recovery of duties. It was held that the Deputy Commissioner was not a proper officer under the Customs Act, thus the notices were deemed invalid. The Court dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:52:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 836 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171206</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise lacked jurisdiction to issue show cause notices for the recovery of duties. It was held that the Deputy Commissioner was not a proper officer under the Customs Act, thus the notices were deemed invalid. The Court dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>