<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 991 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171209</link>
    <description>Compensation received for permitting laying of submarine pipelines within port limits is described as outside the scope of taxable port services because the arrangement was a permission to use port area, not a service rendered in relation to vessels or goods. The note states that the statutory meaning of port services, read with the major ports framework, does not convert a lease-like or estate receipt into taxable service merely because compensation is measured by wharfage. It also notes that where taxability is debatable and the receipt is not shown taxable on the facts, extended limitation is unsustainable, and the connected interest and penalty proposals fail when the demand itself is time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 16:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 991 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171209</link>
      <description>Compensation received for permitting laying of submarine pipelines within port limits is described as outside the scope of taxable port services because the arrangement was a permission to use port area, not a service rendered in relation to vessels or goods. The note states that the statutory meaning of port services, read with the major ports framework, does not convert a lease-like or estate receipt into taxable service merely because compensation is measured by wharfage. It also notes that where taxability is debatable and the receipt is not shown taxable on the facts, extended limitation is unsustainable, and the connected interest and penalty proposals fail when the demand itself is time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>