https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171165 Revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 to 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code is supervisory and must be exercised sparingly: it cannot be used for mere reappreciation of evidence or substitution of a different factual view, but interference is justified where an acquittal reflects manifest illegality or gross miscarriage of justice. A retrial may be ordered in exceptional cases if material evidence was overlooked. On the facts, circumstances such as the deceased being dragged into the house, the house being found locked, the door being broken open, and the mutilated body recovered from the courtyard were treated as material evidence ignored by the trial court, supporting interference and retrial. en-us Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171165 Revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 to 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code is supervisory and must be exercised sparingly: it cannot be used for mere reappreciation of evidence or substitution of a different factual view, but interference is justified where an acquittal reflects manifest illegality or gross miscarriage of justice. A retrial may be ordered in exceptional cases if material evidence was overlooked. On the facts, circumstances such as the deceased being dragged into the house, the house being found locked, the door being broken open, and the mutilated body recovered from the courtyard were treated as material evidence ignored by the trial court, supporting interference and retrial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171165