https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261467 The Bombay High Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing the extended period for the Department without evidence of fraud or collusion. The Banquet Hall was considered a Mandap Keeper and held liable for Service Tax, with food sales treated as incidental sales. The Court also determined that taxing the sale of food under Service Tax would not result in double taxation as it is not already taxed under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261467 The Bombay High Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing the extended period for the Department without evidence of fraud or collusion. The Banquet Hall was considered a Mandap Keeper and held liable for Service Tax, with food sales treated as incidental sales. The Court also determined that taxing the sale of food under Service Tax would not result in double taxation as it is not already taxed under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261467