<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 420 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the stay orders in two cases would continue until the disposal of the appeals, following the decision of a Coordinate Bench at Ahmedabad. It was clarified that there is no provision for further applications for extension of stay beyond a specific date as per section 35C(2A) of the CEA, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized that stay orders granted by the Tribunal remain in force until disposal of the appeals, in line with the statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 420 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the stay orders in two cases would continue until the disposal of the appeals, following the decision of a Coordinate Bench at Ahmedabad. It was clarified that there is no provision for further applications for extension of stay beyond a specific date as per section 35C(2A) of the CEA, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized that stay orders granted by the Tribunal remain in force until disposal of the appeals, in line with the statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>