<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 402 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties for misrepresentation of expenditure and directed reassessment for the deletion of additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The decision highlighted the significance of accurate disclosure and rectification of errors to avoid penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 402 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties for misrepresentation of expenditure and directed reassessment for the deletion of additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The decision highlighted the significance of accurate disclosure and rectification of errors to avoid penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>