https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261437 The Revenue contested the deletion of an addition of on-money paid on purchases of two plots, despite the appellant admitting to the payment. The appellant's denial, lack of evidence linking them to the transactions, and failure to disclose crucial facts led to the deletion of the addition by CIT(A). The tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the importance of evidence and proper procedure, ultimately dismissing the Revenue's appeal. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:25:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261437 The Revenue contested the deletion of an addition of on-money paid on purchases of two plots, despite the appellant admitting to the payment. The appellant's denial, lack of evidence linking them to the transactions, and failure to disclose crucial facts led to the deletion of the addition by CIT(A). The tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the importance of evidence and proper procedure, ultimately dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261437