<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 394 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261433</link>
    <description>The consolidated order confirming the ex-parte assessment under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, treating total sales as unexplained income, and making disallowances under section 40A(3) for cash purchases exceeding Rs. 20,000 was upheld. The assessee&#039;s lack of cooperation, repeated non-appearance, and failure to provide necessary details led to the decision. The Commissioner and Appellate Tribunal affirmed the additions as unexplained income for each assessment year separately, based on available records and the assessee&#039;s non-compliance. The appeals were dismissed due to the assessee&#039;s persistent non-cooperation and failure to present a defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:25:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 394 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261433</link>
      <description>The consolidated order confirming the ex-parte assessment under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, treating total sales as unexplained income, and making disallowances under section 40A(3) for cash purchases exceeding Rs. 20,000 was upheld. The assessee&#039;s lack of cooperation, repeated non-appearance, and failure to provide necessary details led to the decision. The Commissioner and Appellate Tribunal affirmed the additions as unexplained income for each assessment year separately, based on available records and the assessee&#039;s non-compliance. The appeals were dismissed due to the assessee&#039;s persistent non-cooperation and failure to present a defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>