https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171161 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, and concluded that the appellant was not acting in concert with other entities managed and controlled by Ketan Parekh. Consequently, the appellant did not violate Regulation 7 of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171161 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, and concluded that the appellant was not acting in concert with other entities managed and controlled by Ketan Parekh. Consequently, the appellant did not violate Regulation 7 of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171161