<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171159</link>
    <description>Judicial records of what transpired before a court are conclusive and cannot be contradicted in later proceedings through affidavits, oral assertions, or other evidence. Any claimed error must be corrected before the same judge while the matter remains fresh; although a concession may exceptionally be withdrawn for legal mistake and injustice, its recorded making cannot be impeached elsewhere. Where sanction is sought to prosecute a Chief Minister for alleged corruption-related offences, the Council of Ministers may have a direct interest in the decision. The doctrine of necessity permits, and propriety requires, the Governor to decide the sanction question independently rather than on ministerial advice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171159</link>
      <description>Judicial records of what transpired before a court are conclusive and cannot be contradicted in later proceedings through affidavits, oral assertions, or other evidence. Any claimed error must be corrected before the same judge while the matter remains fresh; although a concession may exceptionally be withdrawn for legal mistake and injustice, its recorded making cannot be impeached elsewhere. Where sanction is sought to prosecute a Chief Minister for alleged corruption-related offences, the Council of Ministers may have a direct interest in the decision. The doctrine of necessity permits, and propriety requires, the Governor to decide the sanction question independently rather than on ministerial advice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>