<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261431</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Circular and order-in-original were not ultra vires, directing the petitioner to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal within four weeks. The Tribunal was instructed to consider all contentions, industry practices, and legal provisions, allowing the petitioner to present their case and seek reliefs. The Court emphasized that its order did not express any opinion on the case&#039;s merits, disposing of the Writ Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261431</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Circular and order-in-original were not ultra vires, directing the petitioner to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal within four weeks. The Tribunal was instructed to consider all contentions, industry practices, and legal provisions, allowing the petitioner to present their case and seek reliefs. The Court emphasized that its order did not express any opinion on the case&#039;s merits, disposing of the Writ Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>