<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 366 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261405</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the adjustment of demands under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act was unsustainable due to the failure to consider the petitioner&#039;s objections and the impact of stay orders under Section 220(6). The court directed the revenue to refund the adjusted amount along with interest and quashed the consequential orders demanding interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 366 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261405</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the adjustment of demands under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act was unsustainable due to the failure to consider the petitioner&#039;s objections and the impact of stay orders under Section 220(6). The court directed the revenue to refund the adjusted amount along with interest and quashed the consequential orders demanding interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>