<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 361 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of addition under Sections 36(1)(iii) and 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, as well as the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The ad-hoc disallowance of expenses was partly allowed by restricting it to 5%. The levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was upheld as mandatory and consequential. The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 361 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of addition under Sections 36(1)(iii) and 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, as well as the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The ad-hoc disallowance of expenses was partly allowed by restricting it to 5%. The levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was upheld as mandatory and consequential. The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>