<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1061 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171144</link>
    <description>For the pre-2008 service tax period, the then-prevailing legal position permitted concurrent penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 where tax was not paid and taxable value was suppressed. The dispute concerned non-payment of service tax, non-filing of returns and suppression of value in relation to air travel agents&#039; commission income; the assessee&#039;s assertions about refunds and reduced collection were not supported by convincing evidence. The optional percentage-based method under the Service Tax Rules, 1994 applied uniformly once exercised, and the challenge to simultaneous penalty exposure failed on that footing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1061 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171144</link>
      <description>For the pre-2008 service tax period, the then-prevailing legal position permitted concurrent penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 where tax was not paid and taxable value was suppressed. The dispute concerned non-payment of service tax, non-filing of returns and suppression of value in relation to air travel agents&#039; commission income; the assessee&#039;s assertions about refunds and reduced collection were not supported by convincing evidence. The optional percentage-based method under the Service Tax Rules, 1994 applied uniformly once exercised, and the challenge to simultaneous penalty exposure failed on that footing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>