https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171143 The court dismissed the appellant's application for an extension of time to deposit a required amount, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with court orders. The court noted the appellant's delayed approach and highlighted that seeking an extension would amount to reviewing the earlier order, which is impermissible. The court clarified that challenging the original order in appeal to the Supreme Court would have been the proper remedy if unsatisfied with the granted time for deposit. The application was found devoid of merit and dismissed, underscoring the significance of adhering to court directives promptly. en-us Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:37:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171143 The court dismissed the appellant's application for an extension of time to deposit a required amount, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with court orders. The court noted the appellant's delayed approach and highlighted that seeking an extension would amount to reviewing the earlier order, which is impermissible. The court clarified that challenging the original order in appeal to the Supreme Court would have been the proper remedy if unsatisfied with the granted time for deposit. The application was found devoid of merit and dismissed, underscoring the significance of adhering to court directives promptly. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171143