<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1656 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171141</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the civil miscellaneous petition, condoning the 92-day delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to consider the appeal on its merits, emphasizing the importance of balancing procedural requirements with principles of justice and fairness in condoning delays in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1656 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171141</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the civil miscellaneous petition, condoning the 92-day delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to consider the appeal on its merits, emphasizing the importance of balancing procedural requirements with principles of justice and fairness in condoning delays in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>