<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1062 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171152</link>
    <description>Input service credit on outward transportation service remained admissible after 01.04.2008 where the conditions in CBEC Circular No. 97/8/2007 dated 23.08.2007 were satisfied. The appellant had complied with those conditions, and the adjudicating authority had also recorded such compliance. On that basis, the impugned order was held unsustainable and the appellant was entitled to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:12:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1062 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171152</link>
      <description>Input service credit on outward transportation service remained admissible after 01.04.2008 where the conditions in CBEC Circular No. 97/8/2007 dated 23.08.2007 were satisfied. The appellant had complied with those conditions, and the adjudicating authority had also recorded such compliance. On that basis, the impugned order was held unsustainable and the appellant was entitled to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>