<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 218 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171122</link>
    <description>Food proved to be filthy, putrid, rotten, decomposed or insect-infested is adulterated under Section 2(i)(f) on that footing alone; no additional proof that it was unfit for human consumption is required. Applying that interpretation, insect-infested cashew nuts fell within the provision. The statutory defence under Section 19(2) is available only on proof of purchase from a licensed source or with a prescribed written warranty, together with compliance with the storage and resale conditions; a mere invoice or description of goods is not enough. On the stated facts, the defence was unavailable and the conviction stood restored, with sentence modified as recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 218 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171122</link>
      <description>Food proved to be filthy, putrid, rotten, decomposed or insect-infested is adulterated under Section 2(i)(f) on that footing alone; no additional proof that it was unfit for human consumption is required. Applying that interpretation, insect-infested cashew nuts fell within the provision. The statutory defence under Section 19(2) is available only on proof of purchase from a licensed source or with a prescribed written warranty, together with compliance with the storage and resale conditions; a mere invoice or description of goods is not enough. On the stated facts, the defence was unavailable and the conviction stood restored, with sentence modified as recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>