<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 866 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171120</link>
    <description>Section 19-A(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 provides alternative modes for payment or tender of rent, and the word &quot;or&quot; makes those methods disjunctive rather than cumulative. A tenant may resort to court deposit if one of the prescribed methods is attempted and fails because of the landlord&#039;s conduct. The provision also requires a written notice under clause (b), and service of that notice must be proved. On the stated facts, the tenant did not establish service of the notice, as the alleged notice was not sent by registered post and the certificate of posting was insufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 866 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171120</link>
      <description>Section 19-A(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 provides alternative modes for payment or tender of rent, and the word &quot;or&quot; makes those methods disjunctive rather than cumulative. A tenant may resort to court deposit if one of the prescribed methods is attempted and fails because of the landlord&#039;s conduct. The provision also requires a written notice under clause (b), and service of that notice must be proved. On the stated facts, the tenant did not establish service of the notice, as the alleged notice was not sent by registered post and the certificate of posting was insufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>