<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 943 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171118</link>
    <description>Expunction of judicial remarks is an exceptional remedy available only where the remarks are unwarranted, unsupported by the record, or unnecessary to decide the controversy. The Court held that the adverse remarks complained of arose in the context of the actual dispute over physical possession of the acquired land and were therefore not liable to be expunged. The applicant could not recast the factual basis of the earlier judgment. However, the Court accepted that paragraph 145 required limited modification to balance equities and clarify the position for future conduct in public interest litigation. The prayer for expunction was rejected, but the paragraph was modified to the extent indicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 943 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171118</link>
      <description>Expunction of judicial remarks is an exceptional remedy available only where the remarks are unwarranted, unsupported by the record, or unnecessary to decide the controversy. The Court held that the adverse remarks complained of arose in the context of the actual dispute over physical possession of the acquired land and were therefore not liable to be expunged. The applicant could not recast the factual basis of the earlier judgment. However, the Court accepted that paragraph 145 required limited modification to balance equities and clarify the position for future conduct in public interest litigation. The prayer for expunction was rejected, but the paragraph was modified to the extent indicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>