https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171117 The Bombay High Court treated the appeal as governed by its earlier ruling in Commissioner of C.Ex., Nagpur v. Ispat Industries Ltd., which covered the questions raised against the Revenue. Accepting that binding precedent controlled the controversy, the Court held that no substantial question survived for adjudication and dismissed the appeal. en-us Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2017 10:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171117 The Bombay High Court treated the appeal as governed by its earlier ruling in Commissioner of C.Ex., Nagpur v. Ispat Industries Ltd., which covered the questions raised against the Revenue. Accepting that binding precedent controlled the controversy, the Court held that no substantial question survived for adjudication and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171117