https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171114 A contractual licence for an airport restaurant was held to remain governed by its written terms and the statutory eviction regime under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The licence did not create any right or interest in the premises, and an alleged oral assurance could not convert it into an irrevocable licence or override the prescribed contractual mode of execution. The Estate Officer's proceedings were found fair and within authority, because no written extension existed and the officer was validly appointed by designation under the Act. Claims of discrimination and further extension also failed, as there was no underlying legal entitlement beyond the expired licence. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171114 A contractual licence for an airport restaurant was held to remain governed by its written terms and the statutory eviction regime under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The licence did not create any right or interest in the premises, and an alleged oral assurance could not convert it into an irrevocable licence or override the prescribed contractual mode of execution. The Estate Officer's proceedings were found fair and within authority, because no written extension existed and the officer was validly appointed by designation under the Act. Claims of discrimination and further extension also failed, as there was no underlying legal entitlement beyond the expired licence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171114