<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (9) TMI 343 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171109</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;landless persons&quot; in Section 14 of the U.P. Bhoodan Yagna Act was construed purposively in light of the Bhoodan Yagna scheme under Section 15, rather than by a literal reading. Grants under the scheme were intended for landless agricultural labourers or bhoomihin kisan who depended on agriculture and had no land of their own. The amendment replacing &quot;landless persons&quot; with &quot;landless agricultural labourers&quot; reinforced that scope. As the respondents were businessmen, not agriculturists, and had property and income, they did not fall within the intended class, and cancellation of the allotments was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:20:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (9) TMI 343 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171109</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;landless persons&quot; in Section 14 of the U.P. Bhoodan Yagna Act was construed purposively in light of the Bhoodan Yagna scheme under Section 15, rather than by a literal reading. Grants under the scheme were intended for landless agricultural labourers or bhoomihin kisan who depended on agriculture and had no land of their own. The amendment replacing &quot;landless persons&quot; with &quot;landless agricultural labourers&quot; reinforced that scope. As the respondents were businessmen, not agriculturists, and had property and income, they did not fall within the intended class, and cancellation of the allotments was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>