<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1060 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171105</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s order for the release of detained goods was operational unless stayed by the appropriate authority. Emphasizing compliance with lawful orders, the Court directed the respondents to release the goods within ten days, highlighting the importance of following due process. The Court rejected the correlation between appeal limitation and order enforceability, maintaining the writ petition&#039;s validity due to respondent inaction. The judgment underscored the necessity for seeking a stay for non-implementation and left questions regarding the order&#039;s legality, validity, or propriety open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1060 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171105</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s order for the release of detained goods was operational unless stayed by the appropriate authority. Emphasizing compliance with lawful orders, the Court directed the respondents to release the goods within ten days, highlighting the importance of following due process. The Court rejected the correlation between appeal limitation and order enforceability, maintaining the writ petition&#039;s validity due to respondent inaction. The judgment underscored the necessity for seeking a stay for non-implementation and left questions regarding the order&#039;s legality, validity, or propriety open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>