<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 352 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261391</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues. The judgment emphasized the importance of specific instances and legal provisions in determining the validity of expenses disallowance and the adjustment of seized cash against tax liability, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:36:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 352 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261391</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues. The judgment emphasized the importance of specific instances and legal provisions in determining the validity of expenses disallowance and the adjustment of seized cash against tax liability, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>