<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 336 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, citing technical lapses rather than deliberate concealment or inaccuracies in the deduction and expenses claimed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Cross Objection were both dismissed on June 29, 2015, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 336 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, citing technical lapses rather than deliberate concealment or inaccuracies in the deduction and expenses claimed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Cross Objection were both dismissed on June 29, 2015, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>