<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 334 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging various deletions made by the Ld.CIT(A) for A.Y. 2009-10, including foreign travel expenses, freight and cartage expenses, sample expenses, and late employees&#039; P.F. contribution. The Tribunal upheld the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s decisions based on evidence and case laws. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal regarding storage/damage expenses, emphasizing the need for proper substantiation in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 334 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging various deletions made by the Ld.CIT(A) for A.Y. 2009-10, including foreign travel expenses, freight and cartage expenses, sample expenses, and late employees&#039; P.F. contribution. The Tribunal upheld the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s decisions based on evidence and case laws. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal regarding storage/damage expenses, emphasizing the need for proper substantiation in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>