<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 332 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261371</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the first appellate order were dismissed, affirming the penalties imposed under sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing specific details in penalty orders, adhering to legal timeframes, and establishing reasonable causes for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 332 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261371</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the first appellate order were dismissed, affirming the penalties imposed under sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing specific details in penalty orders, adhering to legal timeframes, and establishing reasonable causes for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>