<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171094</link>
    <description>Bail once granted may be cancelled where the accused misuses liberty by threatening witnesses, tampering with evidence, or obstructing the fair course of investigation or trial. The Court treated cancellation as distinct from refusal of bail and upheld cancellation where the allegation of witness intimidation was supported by an affidavit and was not effectively rebutted. The usual practice of placing a later bail or cancellation application before the same judge is a rule of judicial discipline, not an inflexible mandate, and deviation did not vitiate the order absent shown prejudice. The cancellation was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171094</link>
      <description>Bail once granted may be cancelled where the accused misuses liberty by threatening witnesses, tampering with evidence, or obstructing the fair course of investigation or trial. The Court treated cancellation as distinct from refusal of bail and upheld cancellation where the allegation of witness intimidation was supported by an affidavit and was not effectively rebutted. The usual practice of placing a later bail or cancellation application before the same judge is a rule of judicial discipline, not an inflexible mandate, and deviation did not vitiate the order absent shown prejudice. The cancellation was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>