<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 232 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171093</link>
    <description>Section 14 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 was treated as barring only a tenant&#039;s voluntary sub-letting, transfer, or assignment without the landlord&#039;s consent. A court-conducted sale of a company in liquidation as a going concern was held to be materially different from the voluntary alienation contemplated by the provision. On that basis, the court held that a rigid application of Section 14 would frustrate the preservation of the undertaking and related employment, and the purchaser&#039;s continuation in the registered office premises was not barred. The application for disclaimer was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 232 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171093</link>
      <description>Section 14 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 was treated as barring only a tenant&#039;s voluntary sub-letting, transfer, or assignment without the landlord&#039;s consent. A court-conducted sale of a company in liquidation as a going concern was held to be materially different from the voluntary alienation contemplated by the provision. On that basis, the court held that a rigid application of Section 14 would frustrate the preservation of the undertaking and related employment, and the purchaser&#039;s continuation in the registered office premises was not barred. The application for disclaimer was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>