https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171088 Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure continues to govern territorial jurisdiction where the defendant resides, carries on business, or the cause of action arises wholly or in part. Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act does not override or impliedly repeal that provision; it only creates an additional forum for trade mark and passing off suits. Because the offending goods were sold in Delhi, part of the cause of action arose there, and the jurisdiction objection failed. The court therefore held that territorial jurisdiction existed to entertain the infringement, passing off and unfair competition suit. en-us Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:51:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171088 Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure continues to govern territorial jurisdiction where the defendant resides, carries on business, or the cause of action arises wholly or in part. Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act does not override or impliedly repeal that provision; it only creates an additional forum for trade mark and passing off suits. Because the offending goods were sold in Delhi, part of the cause of action arose there, and the jurisdiction objection failed. The court therefore held that territorial jurisdiction existed to entertain the infringement, passing off and unfair competition suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171088