https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171086 Territorial jurisdiction in a trademark, copyright and passing off dispute was upheld because the plaint, read as a whole, alleged infringing manufacturing and packaging activity within India and stated that one plaintiff had its registered office in New Delhi; the Court treated the issue as mixed law and fact and held that these pleaded acts were sufficient at the interlocutory stage. Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 55(1) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 supported the jurisdictional basis. Finding the defendants' marks and packaging deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' marks, the Court held that a prima facie case for interim protection existed and confirmed the injunction, while rejecting vacation of injunction and return of plaint. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:39:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171086 Territorial jurisdiction in a trademark, copyright and passing off dispute was upheld because the plaint, read as a whole, alleged infringing manufacturing and packaging activity within India and stated that one plaintiff had its registered office in New Delhi; the Court treated the issue as mixed law and fact and held that these pleaded acts were sufficient at the interlocutory stage. Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 55(1) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 supported the jurisdictional basis. Finding the defendants' marks and packaging deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' marks, the Court held that a prima facie case for interim protection existed and confirmed the injunction, while rejecting vacation of injunction and return of plaint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171086