<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171082</link>
    <description>Under the proviso to Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the six-month limitation period for seeking a reference does not run merely from the date of the award where the claimant was not present or represented and no notice under Section 12(2) was served. Time begins when the award is actually or constructively communicated or otherwise known, and knowledge must extend to the essential contents of the award. On the evidence, an earlier application for interim payment did not prove such knowledge; the accepted date of knowledge was receipt of compensation. The reference application was therefore within time and not barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171082</link>
      <description>Under the proviso to Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the six-month limitation period for seeking a reference does not run merely from the date of the award where the claimant was not present or represented and no notice under Section 12(2) was served. Time begins when the award is actually or constructively communicated or otherwise known, and knowledge must extend to the essential contents of the award. On the evidence, an earlier application for interim payment did not prove such knowledge; the accepted date of knowledge was receipt of compensation. The reference application was therefore within time and not barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>