<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (4) TMI 109 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171079</link>
    <description>For revision under section 33A, the phrase &quot;from the date of the order&quot; is read in a practical sense so the remedial right is not defeated by delayed communication or non-promulgation. Limitation starts only when the assessee has actual or constructive notice of the order, because a revision remedy can be effectively exercised only when the affected party knows, or is deemed to know, of it. On that basis, the revision application was within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 12:32:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (4) TMI 109 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171079</link>
      <description>For revision under section 33A, the phrase &quot;from the date of the order&quot; is read in a practical sense so the remedial right is not defeated by delayed communication or non-promulgation. Limitation starts only when the assessee has actual or constructive notice of the order, because a revision remedy can be effectively exercised only when the affected party knows, or is deemed to know, of it. On that basis, the revision application was within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>