https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171071 Once the Supreme Court had treated the earlier dispute over determination of the distillery licence as concluded and fixed a final date for cessation of manufacture, the distillery could not seek renewal or continued operation beyond that date. The High Court's interim stay of dispossession and permission to continue in possession were inconsistent with that conclusive order and were set aside. Disposal of remaining stock, apparatus, storage vessels and distilling plant was required to proceed under the applicable distillery rule and the directions of the Financial Commissioner after revocation, cancellation or determination of the licence. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:17:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171071 Once the Supreme Court had treated the earlier dispute over determination of the distillery licence as concluded and fixed a final date for cessation of manufacture, the distillery could not seek renewal or continued operation beyond that date. The High Court's interim stay of dispossession and permission to continue in possession were inconsistent with that conclusive order and were set aside. Disposal of remaining stock, apparatus, storage vessels and distilling plant was required to proceed under the applicable distillery rule and the directions of the Financial Commissioner after revocation, cancellation or determination of the licence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171071