<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 625 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171070</link>
    <description>A no-confidence motion carried by the requisite majority against a Sarpanch, Up-sarpanch, President or Vice-President of a Panchayat is not itself an appealable or revisable order or decision under the Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1993, because its legal effect flows from members&#039; individual voting and the statute provides automatic cessation of office. However, once the District Panchayat exercises appellate jurisdiction under section 242, its appellate order may be revised by the State Government under section 259, since revision then lies against the appellate order and not the original motion. The interim arrangement was modified accordingly, with the appellate order stayed pending fresh decision of the revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 625 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171070</link>
      <description>A no-confidence motion carried by the requisite majority against a Sarpanch, Up-sarpanch, President or Vice-President of a Panchayat is not itself an appealable or revisable order or decision under the Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1993, because its legal effect flows from members&#039; individual voting and the statute provides automatic cessation of office. However, once the District Panchayat exercises appellate jurisdiction under section 242, its appellate order may be revised by the State Government under section 259, since revision then lies against the appellate order and not the original motion. The interim arrangement was modified accordingly, with the appellate order stayed pending fresh decision of the revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>