<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 35F(1) applies despite notice issued pre-Finance Act 2014; amended provisions are valid.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23711</link>
    <description>Mandatory pre-deposit - Petitioner would not be justified in urging that the amended provisions of Section 35F(1) of the Act would not apply merely on the ground that the notice to show cause was issued prior to the enforcement of Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:26:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:26:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 35F(1) applies despite notice issued pre-Finance Act 2014; amended provisions are valid.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23711</link>
      <description>Mandatory pre-deposit - Petitioner would not be justified in urging that the amended provisions of Section 35F(1) of the Act would not apply merely on the ground that the notice to show cause was issued prior to the enforcement of Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:26:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>