<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Construction Costs Reviewed: Section 40A(3) Targets Cash Payments, Not Authenticity; No Disallowance u/s 37(1).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23700</link>
    <description>Disallowance of cost of construction - Since only provisions of 40A(3) are invoked, there is no question of treating the expenditure as &#039;non-genuine&#039; as no amount was disallowed u/s. 37(1). Provisions of Section 40A(3) can only be invoked on the expenditure which was paid in cash - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 07:21:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 07:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Construction Costs Reviewed: Section 40A(3) Targets Cash Payments, Not Authenticity; No Disallowance u/s 37(1).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23700</link>
      <description>Disallowance of cost of construction - Since only provisions of 40A(3) are invoked, there is no question of treating the expenditure as &#039;non-genuine&#039; as no amount was disallowed u/s. 37(1). Provisions of Section 40A(3) can only be invoked on the expenditure which was paid in cash - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 07:21:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>