<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 313 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant must comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, effective from 6.8.2014. Failure to meet this requirement would lead to the appeal not being entertained, in line with statutory provisions and legal precedents discussed during the analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 313 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant must comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, effective from 6.8.2014. Failure to meet this requirement would lead to the appeal not being entertained, in line with statutory provisions and legal precedents discussed during the analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>