<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 311 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that there is no need for filing further applications for extension of stay once the initial stay order is in force beyond a specific date. The judgment emphasized the continuity of stay orders granted under section 35C of the CEA, 1944 until the final disposal of appeals, based on observations regarding omissions of provisos. This decision streamlines the process for disposal of appeals without requiring additional applications for extension of stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 06:46:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 311 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that there is no need for filing further applications for extension of stay once the initial stay order is in force beyond a specific date. The judgment emphasized the continuity of stay orders granted under section 35C of the CEA, 1944 until the final disposal of appeals, based on observations regarding omissions of provisos. This decision streamlines the process for disposal of appeals without requiring additional applications for extension of stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>