<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 296 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261335</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent assessee, concluding that the commission payments for liaisoning work were legitimate business expenses and not illegal expenditures. The Court emphasized that for an expense to be disallowed under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, it must be prohibited by law, which was not the case here. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 06:44:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 296 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261335</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent assessee, concluding that the commission payments for liaisoning work were legitimate business expenses and not illegal expenditures. The Court emphasized that for an expense to be disallowed under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, it must be prohibited by law, which was not the case here. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>