<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 292 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261331</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition for undervaluation of closing stock, emphasizing the consistent valuation method followed by the assessee. Regarding the disallowance of commission and dalali expenses, the ITAT modified the CIT(A)&#039;s restriction, confirming an addition of Rs. 2,61,840/- for specific payments lacking proper evidence. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 06:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 292 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261331</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition for undervaluation of closing stock, emphasizing the consistent valuation method followed by the assessee. Regarding the disallowance of commission and dalali expenses, the ITAT modified the CIT(A)&#039;s restriction, confirming an addition of Rs. 2,61,840/- for specific payments lacking proper evidence. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>