<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 288 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) wrongly dismissed the appeals for non-payment of taxes due on returned income before filing the appeal. The Tribunal clarified that while payment of tax is mandatory, the requirement to pay before filing the appeal is directory. The appeals were allowed, and the CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate them on merits, granting the assessee a hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 288 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) wrongly dismissed the appeals for non-payment of taxes due on returned income before filing the appeal. The Tribunal clarified that while payment of tax is mandatory, the requirement to pay before filing the appeal is directory. The appeals were allowed, and the CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate them on merits, granting the assessee a hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>