<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Argument Against Extended Limitation Period for Pre-August 1996 Cases Due to Lack of Suppression Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23695</link>
    <description>Invocation of extended period of limitation - The plea of the appellant is that if there is no suppression post August, 1996, no extended period could be invoked post August, 1996 and, therefore, the same analogy will have to be applied for the period prior to August, 1996 as well cannot be accepted - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:48:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Argument Against Extended Limitation Period for Pre-August 1996 Cases Due to Lack of Suppression Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23695</link>
      <description>Invocation of extended period of limitation - The plea of the appellant is that if there is no suppression post August, 1996, no extended period could be invoked post August, 1996 and, therefore, the same analogy will have to be applied for the period prior to August, 1996 as well cannot be accepted - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:48:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>