https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171064 The State Government, acting as revisional authority, could issue general policy directions but could not directly decide individual allotment applications in place of the statutory development authority; such interference was beyond jurisdiction and unenforceable. Allotment made in breach of an operative High Court restraint order created no enforceable right and was void in law. A writ court also could not grant allotment relief beyond the pleadings or prayers, and suppression of material facts further disentitled the claimant to discretionary relief. The stated ratio is that a superior or revisional authority cannot perform the competent authority's statutory function, an act done in defiance of subsisting judicial restraint is a nullity, and relief cannot exceed the case pleaded. en-us Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171064 The State Government, acting as revisional authority, could issue general policy directions but could not directly decide individual allotment applications in place of the statutory development authority; such interference was beyond jurisdiction and unenforceable. Allotment made in breach of an operative High Court restraint order created no enforceable right and was void in law. A writ court also could not grant allotment relief beyond the pleadings or prayers, and suppression of material facts further disentitled the claimant to discretionary relief. The stated ratio is that a superior or revisional authority cannot perform the competent authority's statutory function, an act done in defiance of subsisting judicial restraint is a nullity, and relief cannot exceed the case pleaded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171064